 |
| Subscriber Login: |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tell us about an award |
| Know of a new award? Tell
us about it. |
|
|
|
| You are here:
Home > Awards & Decisions by Date
|
Awards and Decisions listed by Date
Awards and decisions are listed in reverse chronological order (from the current year, through to pre-2000).
Click on a year to view a list of awards and decisions from that year.
To display an award or decision, click on the linked title.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Number of search results per page 10 | 25 | 50
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Awards and Decisions: 2007 |
Displaying 1 to 10 of 40 |
 |
| 1. |
Azurix Corp v Argentina, Request for a Continued Stay of Enforcement, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, IIC 317 (2007), signed 28 December 2007  (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
|
| 2. |
BG Group plc v Argentina, Final Award, Ad hoc—UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; IIC 321 (2007), signed 24 December 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
|
| 3. |
European Media Ventures SA v Czech Republic, Judgment on jurisdiction, (2007) EWHC 2851 (Comm); IIC 313 (2007), signed 05 December 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
Keyword(s): Arbitral rules & institutions – UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules – Review of arbitral awards – Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals – Standard of review – Subject matter of the dispute (and jurisdiction) – Expropriation – Treaties, interpretation – Object & purpose (treaty interpretation and) – Ordinary meaning (treaty interpretation and) – Rules of treaty interpretation – Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
Core issue(s): 1. Whether a Tribunal's jurisdiction was limited to disputes as to the amount of compensation to be paid to an investor following
expropriation, or as to whether compensation should be paid at all to an investor based on the wording of Agreement between
the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic and the Belgium-Luxembourg Economic Union for the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection
of Investments which provided that, in the context of expropriation, only disputes ‘concerning compensation’ may be referred
to arbitration.
2. To what extent contextual material presented by a party could assist in the proper interpretation of a treaty.
|
| 4. |
City Oriente Ltd v Ecuador, Decision on provisional measures, ICSID Case No ARB/06/21; IIC 309 (2007), signed 19 November 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
Keyword(s): Conduct of proceedings – Interim measures – Interim measures, ICSID article 47
Core issue(s): Whether provisional measures should have been ordered to ensure that the legal situation in place prior to the commencement
of arbitration be maintained pending a final award.
|
| 5. |
City Oriente Ltd v Ecuador, Interim protection orders, ICSID Case No ARB/06/21; IIC 308 (2007), signed 24 October 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
Keyword(s): Conduct of proceedings – Interim measures – Interim measures, ICSID article 47
Core issue(s): Whether interim protection orders should have been issued by the Tribunal, pending a ruling on provisional measures, to ensure
the effectiveness of the provisional relief requested by City Oriente.
|
| 6. |
Suez and ors v Argentina, Disqualification Decision, ICSID Case No ARB/03/17; IIC 312 (2007), signed 22 October 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
Keyword(s): Arbitrators
|
| 7. |
RosInvest Co UK Ltd v Russian Federation, Jurisdiction award, SCC Case No V079/2005; IIC 315 (2007), signed 05 October 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
Keyword(s): Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals – Consent to jurisdiction through treaties – Standards of treatment – Most-favoured-nation treatment (MFN) – Expropriation – Treaties, interpretation – Authority of previous decisions (precedents) – Object & purpose (treaty interpretation and) – Ordinary meaning (treaty interpretation and) – Rules of treaty interpretation – Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
Core issue(s): Whether the most-favoured-nation clause in a bilateral investment treaty (‘BIT’) can attract the application of arbitration
clauses in other BITs.
|
| 8. |
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets LP v Argentina, Decision on Claimants' Request for Rectification and /or Supplementary
Decision of the Award, ICSID Case No ARB/01/3; IIC 318 (2007), signed 03 October 2007 despatched 25 October 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
Keyword(s): Arbitral rules & institutions – ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) – Review of arbitral awards – Correction of award – Claims – Incidental & additional claims – Remedies and costs – Costs and expenses – Interest, post-award
Core issue(s): Whether a tribunal may award post-award interest in the absence of a respective request.
|
| 9. |
Archer Daniels Midland Company and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc v Mexico, Award and Separate Opinion, ICSID Case
No ARB(AF)/04/05; IIC 329 (2007), signed 26 September 2007 despatched 21 November 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
|
| 10. |
Sempra Energy International v Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/02/16; IIC 304 (2007), signed 18 September 2007 despatched 28 September 2007 (free)
Content set: Awards & Decisions
Keyword(s): Attribution – Claims – Contract claims – Tax claim – Treaty claim – Umbrella clause – Measure – Tax measures – Standards of treatment – Arbitrary (unreasonable) & discriminatory treatment standard – Fair and equitable treatment standard – Full protection and security – Legitimate expectations – Expropriation – Creeping expropriation – Expropriation of contract rights – Indirect expropriation – Remedies and costs – Compensation – Damages – Date of valuation – Interest
Core issue(s): Whether Argentina modified its regulatory framework in violation of the Argentina-US BIT, in particular obligations related
to fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, arbitrary and discriminatory treatment, and expropriation.
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| Sign Up for
Alerts |
|
| Receive free
updates on Investment Claims by
email or RSS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
